Lapatinib minimally effective for non-small-cell lung cancer
& u/ S1 S: A) UMARCH 18, 2010
0 X1 N2 g$ M& m3 }$ J+ j# c v1 M. G; j3 M# t# C9 T
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Although well tolerated, lapatinib is minimally effective as monotherapy for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to a report in the March 15th Clinical Cancer Research.
; y! b Y2 c* X$ m2 o; n
$ ^5 I/ T7 \1 @+ j. a4 u1 G& E# e0 h, nLapatinib (GlaxoSmithKline) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of both epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2, the authors explain, and thus has theoretical advantages over inhibition of either EGFR or HER2 alone.
& r% j' v; K5 j" n
! J. y% R* v# c- a0 VDr. Helen J. Ross, from Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, and colleagues evaluated the overall response rate to lapatinib in 131 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Sixty-five patients were randomized to lapatinib 1500 mg once daily and 66 to lapatinib 500 mg twice daily.
$ m, Y; w; p1 G3 l" x- L. Y) I4 f' J( `" K! T& q
When the study began, patients with any type of advanced or metastatic NSCLC were recruited ("non-targeted" population). However, when data from other studies began to show that EGFR inhibitors are particularly effective in patients with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and in never-smokers with any histology of NSCLC, recruitment began to "target" such patients.6 R& Q+ C+ J0 n
' \, u% s( D+ p) QThe targeted population included 24 patients in the 1500 mg/day group and 32 in the 500 mg twice daily group. The corresponding numbers in the non-targeted population were 41 and 34.
* Y9 j4 c. T4 m) h" }1 z+ K+ k2 W, m( i
At the interim analysis of the first 30 targeted patients to reach the initial response evaluation, the response rate was 0% in both treatment groups. In the non-targeted population, one patient in the 1500-mg group achieved a partial response.
) r0 k+ D5 c$ z5 P" ]; y2 M4 v; Z) `/ \9 Y( H$ ^ C. |
Overall, 31 of 131 patients (24%) had stable disease or better.
& C+ A9 L& Z2 S: h7 q" R
; T3 \9 z* h4 a3 S% `Based on these findings, the study was stopped for reasons of futility, the investigators state.
* q/ Z7 ^7 ?5 N( N
' p# m* i2 r: _7 X$ Q+ POverall survival in the targeted population was 15.2 months for the 1500-mg once-daily group and 13.9 months for the 500-mg twice-daily group, and in the nontargeted population, overall survival was 11.4 months for the 1500-mg once-daily group and 8.1 months for the 500-mg twice-daily group.
4 q& g4 c, w* ^2 ? H, G0 \+ W
/ K; f( M5 Z: z$ h) V8 }9 T: YMedian progression-free survival was 15.6 weeks (1500-mg once-daily) and 8.7 weeks (500-mg twice-daily) in the targeted population and 12.0 weeks (1500-mg once-daily) and 8.6 weeks (500-mg twice-daily) in the nontargeted population. 2 ^2 u) S. P$ \+ |! @$ h" z. O
. ^3 Q5 k, W$ BThe incidence of adverse events considered to be related to study medication was 89% for 1500 mg once daily and 83% for 500 mg twice daily, but only 8% of patients in each group experienced serious adverse events related to study medication.
/ g9 c: |% {3 l1 p# g+ K
: S7 x, ~0 }; P. c5 z3 |" i4 mAmong 92 patients with tumor tissue available, 2 had mutations in EGFR and 1 had mutations in both EGFR and KRAS. None had mutations in HER2. / s& C) M* `! j$ U3 h) h' J
$ x, @/ |) m X5 t# x! w3 F
Of 77 patients with sufficient DNA for gene copy evaluation, 5 (8.8%) had increased EGFR copy number and 2 (3.5%) had increased HER2 gene copy number.
H3 k2 z4 S1 {" @' x5 K: N n t
2 \' e" g* L/ QNone of the patients with EGFR mutations responded to lapatinib, and only 1 patient with HER2 amplification had an unconfirmed decrease of 51% in tumor measurement.
5 w. g1 G: W3 ^" b5 u0 q9 |) j" e- r$ d! @
"Lapatinib as a single agent at the doses studied seems to have minimal single-agent activity, at least as measured by response rates," the authors conclude, "although progression-free survival in the 1500-mg once-daily group was in the range that would be expected with first-line chemotherapy."
1 M0 Z6 |4 }9 q- h' \" n2 q* ^, ?) V$ q6 H9 y) j2 C" h5 L4 k
"Patients in this small study had a suggestion of disease stabilization with lapatinib," Dr. Ross said. "It would be of interest to examine it in the adjuvant setting after resection perhaps, after chemoradiotherapy perhaps or after up-front chemotherapy. It is possible that combination with other targeted agents, such as anti-angiogenic agents, might be useful."
- K6 c& R) G' u3 p
, B# c4 l6 b+ Y; p+ eThe study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline.' q/ i; }% z2 X) `# ^5 }% q, q
|